Thanks for the response Dave.
This is something you'd have a hard time doing even in Perl.
Hmm, I thought maybe TT would make it easy for me by not treating "A.B" as a hash key but as two keys, but I guess yep, I am asking the impossible, or the unlikely at least.
> Just out of curiosity, why do you need to show portions of a > multi-level hash in a flattened representation?
Well, that's just what my API returns, a hash ref with that sort of structure. I will probably write something that recurses through the hash and creates multiple levels of table headers but I was just going for something super quick and dirty.
Next qn: Sometimes my API returns an IxHash, ie an ordered hash. When this happens I cannot use the hash virtual methods, although they all make logical sense. IxHash has methods like Keys Values similar to the vmethods, but the case is different. Any ideas here?
thanks, jamie
_______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
