On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Dave Cross wrote:
> You're discussing different things. You're talking (correctly) about
> HTML, but Rod is talking (also correctly) about XHTML.
>
> It's well worth considering changinga all of your pages to valid XHTML
> - and it shouldn't be too hard if they are generated from templates :)
Thanks all. I have been trying for xhtml 1.0 compliance in all my coding
but I've sometimes found conflicting evidence. Standards verses tutorials
verses examples. I was pretty sure I wanted checked="checked" but I've
seen examples where they used all UPPERCASE for the tags which is a no-no
in xhtml. But I had to ask. (If you've done anything where the designer
used Dreamweaver I'll know what a pain it is to get it standards
compliant. :-)
Still, all-in-all the change from radio to checkbox made the original
question well worth the finger effort.
Once I get checky reinstalled I'll be beating the .*html code up again.
Again thanks,
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
