I can't speak to it on windows but we have been using A2 and MP2
for quite sometime now... ( upwards of a year )... anyway...
very stable... only one mp bug that hit us and a quick upgrade took
care of that...
site in question was serving about 15 gigs of data a month... so...
judge for yourself...
Robert wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 16:51 -0500, Robert wrote:
Not quite. While I would love to be running mod_perl, I am limited to using
CGI only. Hence the question...
It's pretty unusual to be able to choose your web server but not be able
to choose whether you run a specific module or not.
If you're unable to choose which modules get compiled into the server,
you might want to look into SpeedyCGI as an alternative.
- Perrin
Well I am on Windows and mod_perl(1) and Apache 1 are limited to a
single process (not a good thing). I see on the mod_perl site that
mod_perl(2) and Apache2 do not have that limitation *but* that version
of mod_perl is in a 'development stage' and I would rather not 'trust'
my stuff to it without some feedback from people that are using mp2 and
A2.
Robert
_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
|
begin:vcard
fn:Sean T. Allen
n:Allen;Sean T.
org:USA Herbals, LLC
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Tech Guru
tel;work:718-388-5424
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
