On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:30:19PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2005 4:20 pm, Brett Sanger wrote: > > Bricolage isn't faring well so far due to its complexity, but it's not > > out of the running. What else would people recommend I consider? > > However, it uses HTML::Template, not Template Toolkit, so if you have a bunch > of template using complex TT constructs it might be painful to migrate.
Yeah, Krang didn't make my list because of that. We don't use any TT constructs that can't convert over [programming doesn't belong in the template] with the explicit and important exception of plugins. That's why I originally move to TT from HTML::Template. Otherwise my perl code was bending over to try and offer data that wasn't part of it's core functionality so the template could use it. Otherwise I agree...I'm assuming some customization will be involved. I'm just avoiding systems that make customization difficult. -- SwiftOne / Brett Sanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
