>>>>> "Todd" == Todd W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Todd> I use only the PROCESS directive, but I like to use the WRAPPER Todd> directive where apropriate. The example in Template::Directives POD Todd> compares it to PROCESS. Does WRAPPER have the same semantics as Todd> INCLUDE, or does it work like the speedier PROCESS directive? [% WRAPPER foo ... %] stuff [% END %] is like [% INCLUDE foo content = "stuff" ... %] It has to work like INCLUDE because you don't want "content" to get set in the outer context. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
