On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 13:15 -0600, Paul Seamons wrote: > So it is only 50% faster on the cached in memory templates. It is actually > slower if you are using XS. If you are using cached in memory templates, you > are going to see the least amount of return from using CGI::Ex::Template.
I would expect any TT user concerned about performance to be using cached templates and the XS stash. > The interesting thing is that TT in memory and using XS is only 100% faster > than CGI::Ex::Template getting a new object each time. Without XS, TT in > memory is only 40% faster than CGI::Ex::Template getting a new object each > time. Sounds like it could be great for people who are stuck using CGI. TT doesn't perform well without the cache. > Most of the built in TT plugins work That's good. Some of those (tables, date formatting) are practically part of the language at this point for me. - Perrin _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
