On 10/20/06, Bill Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/20/06, Clayton Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, if the TT decision to use _ was based on Perl 6 I think it's relevant.
The Perl 6 concat operator decision and discussion was over 4 years ago: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language/12144 Andy wanted a concat operator and "." was already used. He made a choice based on what Perl 6 would use but then Larry changed is mind (Larry is always right). So TT has a concat operator of "_". Who cares, it works great. Clayton _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
