Paul, >> According to my previous example: >> [% SET a = " >> adsf >> adsf >> " >> %] > > Yes. I re-installed 2.15 and tried that string and I got the nice > spacing. Well, not so nice spacing. I still didn't get the error > coming up on the PERL block though. I don't have any good answers for > you there. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce that :( It happened some time ago in a rather compex MACRO + BLOCK + RAWPER (etc...) construct...
> Not sure if it is an acceptable solution - but you could try > CGI::Ex::Template which should be a drop in replacement. A large > change though is that the cache files are storable data rather than > perl that will be evaled. Thank you for the suggestion. Actually TT beats the speed of CET in the application I am using. Also I have created a workaround for these padding spaces, so it is no longer an issue... I would love the current behaviour to be changed, nevertheless. - Fagzal _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
