On Feb 17, 2009, at 15:01, Josh Rosenbaum wrote: > The image captcha method still has the drawbacks of being harder to > read than plain text and not as accessible, though. recaptcha.net > also comes with the added drawback of relying on 3rd party servers > for the captcha to work along with any possible downtime and delays > that come with them. (Feel free to let me know if I'm wrong here or > if there is a way to use recaptcha.net without the 3rd party servers.)
You are right that if you have an environment that's not hooked up consistently to the internet then it won't work. I know that some Big Corps have given the recaptcha people hardware to help them build their service more robust. For the harder to read part, that's another thing I like about their captchas. Because they depend on OCR of a scanned text having failed rather than on just trying to scramble some letters they are MUCH easier to read than other captchas. Anyway, I'll get the broken record moving on now. :-) - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/ _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://mail.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
