On 03/17/09 11:13, Bill Holler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your kernel is panicking on this line:
>
> /*
>         * Does the package look coherent?
>         */
>        cnt = obj->Package.Elements[0].Integer.Value;
>
>
> The system's ACPI _CST object claimed to have more than 2 elements.
> However dereferencing Elements[0] traps.
>
> In short: your BIOS has a buggy _CST table.  Please try upgrading
> your BIOS.  A possible workaround is to disable C-state in BIOS.
> If that does not avoid this issue, then set idle_cpu_no_deep_c
> with kmdb at boot:
>    1. Add these flag to the end of the grub $kernel line:
>       -k -d
>    2. boot will stop in kmdb
>    3. [0] > idle_cpu_no_deep_c/w1
>    4. [0] > :c

If you need to disable C-states in kmdb (because they
could not be disabled in BIOS), then also add this line
to /etc/system to avoid having to apply the kmdb workaround
every boot:

set  idle_cpu_no_deep_c=1

>
>
>
> On the other hand Solaris can use ontrap protection to guard
> against traps due to bad ACPI tables.  Please file a bug to
> add ontrap protection for ACPI table access.

Please assign the bug to me.

Thank you,
Bill

>
> Best regards,
> Bill Holler
>
>
>
> On 03/17/09 09:48, Kuriakose Kuruvilla wrote:
>> Panic during
>>
>> cmntrap
>> cpu_acpi_cache_cst
>> cpu_acpi_cache_cstate_data
>> cpu_idle_init
>> post_startup
>> genunix:main
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Lu from b105 - b110, panic on reboot
>> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:27:27 +0000
>> From: Mike Ramchand <Mike.Ramchand at Sun.COM>
>> To: nv-users at sun.com
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've just LUed from 105 to 110 on my Tosh M9.
>>
>> I get a panic (every time) on reboot.
>>
>> The only packages which failed on the LU were SUNWxwfnt (which I
>> manually installed, and SUNWdcopy (which I've tried unchanged, removed,
>> and re-installed.)
>>
>> I enabled kmdb, and attached is the pretty picture I get. Any clues?
>>
>> (I've also searched bugtraq, and sunsolve for references to
>> cpu_acpi_cache and 6612299, 6756843 and 6781321 are all that I found,
>> but they don't seem related)
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tesla-dev mailing list
> tesla-dev at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev


Reply via email to