Napanda Pemmaiah wrote: > On 09/03/08 15:02, Bill Holler wrote: >> On 09/ 3/08 02:25 PM, Napanda Pemmaiah wrote: >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>> Since the cpupm-gate is merged with ONNV_97, it has the latest P >>> and T-State related code, and Aubrey has also resolved all the >>> conflicts in the cpupm-gate during the merge and therefore >>> there is nothing to remove. >>> I assume ONVV_97 should already be in opensolaris repository, but I >>> am not very sure about the lag between opensolaris repo and nevada. >>> Is there any reason of not wanting to putback into >>> ON gate? >>> >> >> Anything we do not know is there should not be put back. ;-) >> As far as I know, only new Deep C-State work is in cpupm-gate. > It also has powertop related changes, but I don't know if it effects > the C-State code changes. > Previously, Mark is also working on the cpupm-gate to re-construct cpupm framework, but somehow cpupm-gate is put aside later. And after the new framework and T-state related code are into onnv_97, the cpupm-gate only has deep cstate work and powertop. I merged with powertop repo only for development convenience but now I found it's incovenient for code merge. We can remove powertop from cpupm-gate.
What do you think? Thanks, -Aubrey
