Rafael Vanoni wrote: > Sure, that one slipped through. > > How about > > C-states -> Power states > P-states -> Frequency states > I wonder if "Power States" is too broad. What about "Idle States" for C-states?
Thanks... -Eric
Rafael Vanoni wrote: > Sure, that one slipped through. > > How about > > C-states -> Power states > P-states -> Frequency states > I wonder if "Power States" is too broad. What about "Idle States" for C-states?
Thanks... -Eric