Li, Aubrey wrote:
> Rafael.Vanoni wrote:
> 
>> Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>> Rafael Vanoni wrote:
>>>
>>>> The problem was that the xcalls probe fires N times within
>>>> xc_common, and the script was zeroing the variable with the address
>>>> of the xcall function after the first one. 
>>>>
>>>> This export contains all the changes from the previous with this
>>>> issue fixed. Let me know what you think.
>>>>
> 
> I was using cpu-option.diff from this email and got the following report.
> =============================
> Cn                      Avg     residency       
> C0 (cpu running)             (88.8%)    
> C1                      0.6ms   (11.2%) 
> =============================
> when my system is in IDLE(mpstat told me all cpus are 100% idle).
> 
> This is in curse mode. C-state residency report in dump mode is okay.
> Did I do anything wrong? I can look more details tomorrow.

Hmm.. were you running with the -c option?

I've been testing the new option by running one PowerTOP instance per 
CPU and then binding a CPU intensive process to each core.

Thanks,
Rafael


Reply via email to