On Saturday, September 15, 2007 11:31 PM, Mark.Haywood at Sun.COM wrote: > Li, Aubrey wrote: >> On Thursday, September 13, 2007 9:47 AM, Dana.Myers at Sun.COM wrote: >>> That's my concern, as well - that ACPI CA may not be properly >>> handling the Alias() statement. We need to bounce this off of Bob >>> Moore at Intel (who is the lead engineer for ACPI CA), but first I'd >>> like some information on the purpose of the Alias statements in >>> this case. >>> >> I have another meeting with him a few hours ago. I can forward the >> issue to him. Let's see what feedback. > > I went ahead and created CR 6605212 SpeedStep can't find _PSS for > Processor declared by Alias. > > As I mention in the evaluation, we have a possible fix. But until we > get a little more information, I'm not convinced it's the right > one. Aubrey, > did you get any feedback from Bob? >
Sorry, I didn't get any feedback yet. I'll try again. What possible fix do you mean? -Aubrey
