Hi John, John Harres wrote: > Hi. I've just jumped on this alias to get some idea of the impact of > these changes to the crashdump analysis tool I work on. It's nice to > get some of this info in advance to the changes making the tool suddenly > not work ;) >
Welcome! > Will panic_lbolt and panic_lbolt64 be set on panic as normal with the > new tickless clock? I'm concerned for the fact of getting a > determination of "now" in a coredump. > Definitely. We'll need to cater to all existing consumers of the lbolt time source (including panic_lbolt[64]). The implementation of that time source will change though, but that's not something that the consumers of the time source should have to care about. -Eric
