Hi Bill, Bill.Holler at Sun.COM wrote:
> Hi Aubrey, > > I was only able to look through the first half which looks good. :-) Thanks for the comments, ;-) > > If I remember correctly the ACPI spec defines a latency > 1000 to mean > that c-state is not supported? If so should cpu_acpi_cache_set() > check for cstate->cs_latency > 1000 in its for loop? > That might not be true. Evaluating _CST objects returns how many C states supported, and the latency as well. Different C-state has different latency, it doesn't determine deeper c-state supported or not. The following is some info from my broken machine. C type Latency Power consumption C1 1 - us 1000 - mW C2 1 - us 500 - mW C3 162-us 100 - mW Thanks, -Aubrey
