Actually, the best thing is what I did:  I saw the bounce, and 
forwarded using "correct" email addresses.  After all, it is far 
easier to repost, than to scramble after a breach.

  The biggest point, is that the case has been submitted, and will 
likely have no -1's by tomorrow, so Rafael should be able to proceed.  
Next up is to get the 'turbo' kstat.

  Cheers!

        ---- Randy

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Eric Saxe wrote:

> Yea, sorry about this Randy. If I open the floodgates and allow
> non-subscribers to post, then all sorts of unsavory spam begins to comes
> through.... ;) I'll see if I can add an exception for sac.sfbay...
> 
> Thanks,
> -Eric
> 
> Randy Fishel wrote:
> >   Sorry, but this message has been bounced (often happens when I submit
> > cases via sac).  So forwarding it instead.  Should you choose to reply, use
> > the email addresses below (except use my 'randy.fishel at sun.com' address).
> > 
> >   Cheers!
> > 
> >     ---- Randy
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:04:56 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Randy Fishel <randyf at sac.sfbay.sun.com>
> > To: PSARC-ext at Sun.Com
> > Cc: Rafael.Vanoni at Sun.Com, tesla-dev at opensolaris.org
> > Subject: PowerTOP --cpu option [PSARC/2009/086 Self Review]
> > 
> > 
> > I am sponsoring the following self-review for Rafael Vanoni.  It adds
> > an option to PowerTOP allowing behavior to be focused on a specific
> > cpu.  As other options, the stability is "Uncommitted", and a release
> > binding of "Patch/Micro".
> > 
> > 
> > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI
> > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
> > 1. Introduction
> >     1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
> >      PowerTOP --cpu option
> >     1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
> >      Author:  Rafael Vanoni
> >     1.3  Date of This Document:
> >     10 February, 2009
> > 4. Technical Description
> >        Currently, PowerTOP observes power management related events on a
> > system wide basis. With the growing number of cores and processors in
> > today's system, it is sometimes desirable to observe the system in a finer
> > grained manner. This project introduces a new command line option that
> > allows the user to specify which core/processor he wishes to observe with
> > PowerTOP.
> > 
> >        The new option will focus all of PowerTOP's subwindows into the
> > specified processor. Therefore, presenting the processor's behavior in terms
> > of idle state and frequency level transitions, as well as reporting only
> > events that affect power management on that CPU. This new option can be
> > specified through the --cpu or -c option, and must be followed by a CPU id.
> > It can be used while specifying a time interval (-t), with dump mode (-d),
> > but not with verbose mode (-v). 
> > 
> > Proposed man page addition:
> > 
> > OPTIONS
> > 
> >     -c [processor id]
> > 
> >        Specifies which CPU the tool should observe.
> > 
> > EXAMPLES
> > 
> >     Example 4 Analyzing activity on a specific processor
> > 
> >     This command will run PowerTOP and only display data for CPU 3.
> > 
> >        % powertop -c 3
> > 
> > 
> > 6. Resources and Schedule
> >     6.4. Steering Committee requested information
> >     6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name:
> >             ON
> >     6.5. ARC review type: Automatic
> >     6.6. ARC Exposure: open
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > tesla-dev mailing list
> > tesla-dev at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev
> >   

Reply via email to