Guess I can't +1 our own case :-) The doc is updated to incorporate the lastest feedback AFAICT based on my last conversation with Gerry.
Regarding this being under tesla or PM, the first user of this interface would be FIPE, that's why we wanted to be under tesla, but the notification itself if sort of generic so it really doesn't matter from our perspective as long as there is some place to exist. We agree this will be evolving based on implementation and architecture as it evolves. Thanks Randy for shepherding this though. I have been under the hood to debug some weird things and just managed to get out of the lab. Thanks a ton Cheers, ashok >-----Original Message----- >From: tesla-dev-bounces at opensolaris.org [mailto:tesla-dev-bounces at >opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Eric >Saxe >Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:09 AM >To: Randy Fishel >Cc: tesla-dev at opensolaris.org >Subject: Re: [tesla-dev] CPU idle notification interface (FIPE) > >Randy Fishel wrote: >> Hi All- >> >> There is some (legitimate) pressure to get this integrated into the >> core ASAP, and as such needs to have an ARC review. So to get this >> moving, I need three things from the poject alias (some specific to >> individuals): >> >> First (a good thing for Ashok), is the spec on the project pages >> current? >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/tesla/Work/MemPM/onepager_v3.txt >> If not, point me and this list to the current spec? >> >This looks current to me. Perhaps Gerry can confirm he had incorporated >all the comments from before into this...but it looks that way to me. >> Second, I need sufficient +1's from the leaders that this project is >> desired. >> >+1 from me. One question I have is whether this really should be under >Tesla (which i'm ok with), or whether it should be under the PM >community now that we have one. If this belongs as its own project, then >the PM community CCs need to +1 this. My +1 stands either way. > >> Third, I need sufficient +1's from the leaders that the above spec >> is what you are agreeing to. >> >+1, with the observation that the nitty gritty details might change with >the implementation. > >Thanks, >-Eric >_______________________________________________ >tesla-dev mailing list >tesla-dev at opensolaris.org >http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev
