http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4343
--- Comment #3 from Aubrey.Li <aubrey.li at intel.com> 2008-11-02 22:48:58 --- Do we really need to sort the PGs by number of CPUs? IMHO, the hard coded order is good enough. ======== PGHW_IPIPE, PGHW_CACHE, PGHW_FPU, PGHW_MPIPE, PGHW_CHIP, PGHW_MEMORY, PGHW_POW_ACTIVE, PGHW_POW_IDLE, ======== When the pg is added to the cmt_pgs, the order is from end to the beginning. So the final order looks like: ======== PGHW_POW_IDLE, PGHW_POW_ACTIVE, PGHW_MEMORY, PGHW_CHIP, PGHW_MPIPE, PGHW_FPU, PGHW_CACHE, PGHW_IPIPE, ======== When the policy is CMT_COALESCE, we want core level first and then package level. And if the policy is CMT_BALANCE, we want the package level first and then core level. The default order is perfect for the policy. The number of CPUs seems not match the CMT_COALESCE. Does this make sense? -- Configure bugmail: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
