Bill.Holler wrote: > Li, Aubrey wrote: >> Bill Holler wrote: >> >> >>> Here is a list of things left to do for c-state support on systems >>> with c-state invariant TSCs. The list is in no particular order: >>> >>> 1. Develop code to use the HPET to wakeup a deep c-state idle cpu. >>> 2. Develop code to detect deep c-state support in intel_cpupm_init() >>> similar to what speedstep_support() does for p-state support. >>> 3. lAPIC timer fixup after deep c-state. >>> >>> Did I miss anything??? >>> >> >> The c-state policy, now there is a simple one and ugly. >> I'm not sure how it works with PAD, but I'd like to implement a new >> one in the c-state driver. >> > > Go for it. :-) > I am not sure what the time schedule is for PAD. > We should implement something now for testing before PAD is available. > > The current c-state policy looks like it will work for now? > > I think so, as long as the platform supports deep c-state up to C3.
-Aubrey
