Couldn't we just pull the fix for CR6723133? "hg logs" should tell use what changeset(s) we need.
Li, Aubrey wrote: > Bill Holler wrote: > > >> Just a heads up that cpupm-gate has CR 6723133. >> A debug build will hit this bogus ASSERT on systems with >> cache sizes that are not a power-of-two. An example is Intel >> Q9550 processors with 6MB L2 caches. >> >> The fix is to delete line 1535 from usr/src/uts/i86pc/vm/vm_machdep.c >> ASSERT(ISP2(l2_sz)); >> >> Setting aok/w1 in mdb during boot will workaround this, >> but this will also disable other ASSERTs which may be useful. >> >> >> Apparently OpenSolaris build 94 is not the same as Nevada 94. :-( >> snv_94 closed on Wednesday 2 days later than normal due to the >> July 4th holiday. It is likely OpenSolaris build 94 was pulled >> by a script on the usual Monday night. >> > > Thanks to point it out, this issue seems to be fixed in snv_94. > It looks like we need to upgrade the repo to snv_94, the problem is > how to know the revision number of snv_94? "hg tags" only gave me > the onnv_NUM. > > Thanks, > -Aubrey > > > >> Regards, >> Bill >> >> >> Li, Aubrey wrote: >> >>> the cpupm-gate is now in sync with build 94. >>> Notification not sent due to changesets > 500. >>> As a result, you will have to grab the corresponding closed binaries >>> and >>> >>> use them when building the gate. The closed binaries can be found >>> here: >>> >>> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b94/ >>> >>> Any questions/issues, let me know. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Aubrey >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tesla-dev mailing list >>> tesla-dev at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> tesla-dev mailing list >> tesla-dev at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > tesla-dev mailing list > tesla-dev at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev >
