Hi Eric,

Eric Saxe wrote:

> Hey Aubrey,
> 
> Please take a look at the following change. It fixes an issue with CPU
> enumeration on SPARC, and also makes the command better able
> to support
> c-states greater than 1. :)
> 
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~esaxe/pt_bugfix
> 
> This webrev doesn't reflect your most recent patch that caps the time
> spent in c1 (webrev generated prior to merging with your two
> most recent
> commits)...however these changes may obviate the need for that...since
> with these changes that cap is imposed in do_cpuidle_stats().
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Eric

The patch looks very good. We should consider the offline CPU.
Does it fix the bug [c-state] statistics seem a bit off?
If so, please revert my fix but be based on the suggestion patch.

Thanks,
-Aubrey

Reply via email to