Running the same data through the training system multiple times does not change accuracy in tesseract. It does not use a back-propagation training process at this time.Ray.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Yury Tarasievich < [email protected]> wrote: > > Is the quality of recognition expected to be > improving significantly, if the new scans (same > font and size, same book in fact) are processed > into the .box files using the previous training > results (-l <langcode>) and the resulting new > training then merged with the bulk, then used > for the next new scan? What is the expected > quality curve (exponential, logarithmic etc.)? > Is there any reliably known quantity of data > that's expected to produce, say, 95% accuracy? > > I can't figure this out for myself. Don't see > this happening with my data anyway yet. > > -Yury > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
