Looks like 2 different versions to me, but even if they weren't you do get different results with different compilers/architectures, partly due to the use of random numbers in one of the algorithms, and possibly due to different floating point treatment and/or different qsort functions.Ray.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Parra <parro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have two Linux boxes with tesseract installed. > One, the older, result best ocr results than the other. > > Both were compiled by me. > > The problem is that I can't find the difference between them. > > But I found one difference, in the output they provide: > > The older: > # tesseract c1.tif result > Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine > Image has 24 bits per pixel and size (305,92) > Resolution=96 > > The newer: > # tesseract c1.tif result > Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine > > > Note that the first give me information about the image... > Does this mean something ?? > > Thanks > > Marcello > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to tesseract-ocr@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
