On 24 May 2010 20:18, Lars Aronsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Jimmy O'Regan wrote: >> >> On 24 May 2010 17:41, Lars Aronsson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I tried to compile the current version (svn -r354 up), but failed: >> >> Looks like a pair of missing casts - have you opened an issue? > > No, I have not. I don't know enough of the software. > >> Err... I have no affiliation with Google. > > OK, neither have I, and I have no way to know. > > I'm still paranoid about how secret and untalkative > they are about this project. Why would a big company > rely on some software (supposedly, Tesseract is used > for Google Book Search?) and not keep documentation? > That doesn't make sense. What does make sense is > to have good documentation but not releasing it. And > with the Apache license, that would be legally OK. >
Maybe not paranoid, but you certainly seem to be making a few strange assumptions. There *is* documentation, in the form of source comments. There's also some out of date documentation here: http://tesseract-ocr.repairfaq.org/ -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en.
