>
> Nobody has mentioned any plans to write a .net wrapper for Tesseract
> 3, and the developer of tessnet2 has mentioned that he would rather
> pay for someone to reimplement Tesseract than touch it again, so I
> wouldn't hold my breath, if I were you.
>
Yes, but the main reason is because I had to do very few modification
in tesseract and I can't commit the code.
Can we commit again now?
I just get last alpha 3 version.
Can you explain me this syntax in imgtiff.cpp
tprintf (_("Resolution=%d\n"), *res);
What this underscore mean?
This is not C++ ISO?
> (On a related note, I spent a little while yesterday looking at some
> truly horrifically written spaghetti code[1], so I'm a little less
> unsympathetic than before, but I think he's seriously underestimating
> the magnitude of such a reimplementation).
>
I don't underestimating. And that's why a university or engineer
student will help us during 3 month.
I write in C/C++ since I'm 18 (I'm 41 now), I'm self employed since 10
years, I handled so many projects I know exactly how much work it
needs.
I also know we can't get a good solution triking small pieces of
tesseract code, we need to get the big picture and rewrite it.
Remi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tesseract-ocr" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en.
