An SSD or SAS disk would probably be of more value than quad-core processor. 8 GB RAM and more would be nice too.
On 21 ноя, 02:42, raakeshvara rao <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to buy a new high-performance desktop, as I want to > start to run more Tesseract ( which is a pain on my five year old very > slow xp laptop). > > Typical Usage:- > > Tesseract training for Indic languages > -- With around thousand symbols > -- Typical training image is 1600 x 32000 pixels wide > -- Lot of books in TIFF format ready to be OCRed. > > Softwares > -- Ubuntu > -- Tessearct, Libtiff, GIMP, gcc, Cowboxer, Qt > -- Other software like Octave, MySQL etc. (for statistical analysis, > data warehousing etc.) > > Does a 64-bit processor help (as opposed to 32-bit)? > What core is recommended (Dual? or Quad?) > AMD or Intel ? (It looks like AMD is better value for money than > Intel.) > Given large Image sizes is 4GB DDR2 RAM optimum? Do we need more or > less? > I do not think we need a separate GPU or graphics card as we deal with > static TIFF images, that too in the background mostly. And a normal > iMac like (1680x1050) display should do. I am looking at newegg.com > and looking to buy for thanksgiving. > > Thanks a lot for your time, I recently moved to the SF Bay Area, and > would love to meet people working on Tesseract. My school is in Palo > Alto. > > Regards. > Rak.A> > (650) 497-9915 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en.
