I'm currently working on a project where I am scanning standard 150dpi English-language Arial-font documents. I'm comparing Tesseract against ABBYY in this example. ABBYY wins hands down on all fronts. But ABBYY is expensive for what I'm trying to do.
I love the hocr output feature of tesseract, it makes for easy post processing. I wish ABBYY had a similar command line tool, but instead I have to write custom C++ programs just to get the bounding boxes around words. Patrick. On 3 July 2011 07:10, mw18888 <[email protected]> wrote: > Can anyone comment on the accuracy of Tesseract vs Abbyy? > > Regards, > > mw18888 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en
