I have had the opposite experience: Tess 3.01 beats 3.00 often - the reverse does happen but rarely.
Note that Tess 3.01 will do WORSE if using Tess 3.00 trained data - is it possible you are not using the Tess 3.01 trained data? On Dec 13, 9:22 am, Alasdair <[email protected]> wrote: > For some reason Tesseract 3.01 is giving much poorer accuracy than > 3.00 on exactly the same images. This is the same whether using the > 3.01 English trained data or the 3.00 English trained data. (I would > expect it to at least be the same using the 3.00 trained data.) > > Am I the only person experiencing this? > > If so, what have I done wrong? > > I'm executing it like this: > tesseract "test.tif" "testout" -l eng -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en
