I agree that Abbyy will do the job more accurate out of the box and is easier to get started with. You may also want to have a look at this article: http://www.splitbrain.org/blog/2010-06/15-linux_ocr_software_comparison
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:03:31 PM UTC+4, Scott Oom wrote: > > We are working on automated testing tools for applications and games. > > We want to be able to verify various text in the UIs in different > languages and have been experimenting with Tesseract OCR and having a > lot of fun with it. > > In 2007, Ray Smith mentioned that "Tesseract is now behind the leading > commercial engines in terms of its accuracy." > > What commercial engines are more accurate than Tesseract and in what > ways? Can Tesseract OCR approach the commercial engines with training > and adjusting of parameters or is it still behind? > > Thanks, > -Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en
