Sorry for late reaction, guys. My question was simple - about wrong declaration regardless in which file it was found; and my question was addressed to C++ programmers who know how to answer this. Both was ignored with some kind of RTFM answers. However, it helped me to find *correct* declaration and changing that one line of code made it possible to build everything just fine.
I think discussion on whether I followed rules or not can end NOW. Thanks + regards, Davor On Friday, August 24, 2012 12:13:01 PM UTC+2, TP wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Davor Pleskina > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > I tried to use 1.69. But it happens 1.68 has the same error (wrong > > definition) in allheaders.h. Never mentioned leptprotos.h. > > Leptonica 1.69 is *NOT* officially supported on Windows. Dan told me > it was a Linux-only quick and dirty release so it never went through > the arduous Windows release process (it took us about 1+ month of > continually testing changes to get 1.68 out the door). > > In 1.68 allheaders.h includes leptprotos.h. If you want to *NOT* > follow directions then you need to stop complaining when things don't > work as easily as you expect. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en
