Width and height are image dimensions but are incorrectly labeled as resolution in some applications. Since your images are 96 DPI, tripling their resolution should work better.
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:26:51 AM UTC-6, occorled wrote: > > I was always confused about DPI when it comes to images (versus print). I > thought, it's all about (w x h) resolution, not DPI, right? I found this > page to be informative (and funny) http://www.dpiphoto.eu/dpi.htm. > > So basically, I simply scale the image larger right? Perhaps double or > triple the resolution of "b.jpg", right? > > On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 10:12:05 PM UTC-5, Quan Nguyen wrote: >> >> Rescaling to 300 DPI will produce much better results for the images. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en
