Hi We need to perform handwritten character recognition (English alphabets, numerals). We installed both Tesseract-OCR and Ocropus and tested a handwritten image document with both the engines. With their default existing training data, both the engines gave unsatisfactory results, however Tesseract gave much better result than Ocropus. Speed-wise also Tesseract was giving faster results. In some of the posts in this forum, people have suggested that Ocropus gives better results for handwriting recognition than Tesseract. However our initial test suggests otherwise. Also we need an OCR engine which would update its training set on the fly, on a wrong recognition of a character.
Our problem is now following: 1. If we train both the OCRs with sufficient amount of training data, how do Ocropus and Tesseract fare against each other in that scenario ? 2. Does any of Ocropus or Tesseract has support for updation of training data whenever a bad character recognition is made ? Thanks in advance! Ankit -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
