On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:20:13PM +0200, zdenko podobny wrote: > there is no 100% accuracy - in any OCR.
Zdenko's correct, I'm afraid, even for self-generated images where you can produce "perfect" specimens. Depending on what you're doing, it may make more sense to use something like a QR code to do your stuff, which has error correction and whatnot embedded. Otherwise, if you know the sorts of data you'll be encountering, you can add replace / pattern rules, but if it's base64-encoded text then that isn't really an option. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
