On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 12:38:57 PM UTC-5, rkomar wrote: > So, I would say that totally different results with code > compiled with different options or different compilers > is a sign of bad code. I don't think it should just be > shrugged off as unavoidable. >
I agree with Rob here. Numerical/algorithm instability isn't just going to be an issue between platforms. It indicates a fragility that could be broken by compiler upgrades and other changes on a single platform. The test results that Nick pointed out report on gross error rates, but at the detail level, there are going to be a set of individual characters which are (mis)recognized differently as well as specific reasons for those differences. It'll take work to isolate the problems, but it's certainly not an intractable problem. Speaking optimistically, Ray edited that wiki page just a few days ago, so perhaps he's already on the task. Tom -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
