Hi Casper, On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:46:39AM -0800, Casper Kent wrote: > The Windows box is Intel i3 with 4GB RAM running Windows 7, the Sparc/Solaris > is Sun T5120 with 32 cores and 64GB RAM running Solaris 9. I am using the > latest Tesseract 3.02 with TessAPI/java interface. Any ideas of why such a > drastic difference? The Sparc is Motorola/big-endian, could it be part of the > problem?
I can't speak to the specifics of endianness or similar possible compilation issues that might be affecting this, but one basic thing to bear in mind is that Tesseract isn't multithreaded, so I imagine 31 of those cores won't be used much. A simple possible way to speed things up a lot would be to run lots of tesseract processes in parallel, e.g. with GNU Parallel (or using some Java threading thing). Maybe you're already doing this, but my first port of call would definitely be to see whether all of the box is being used. Nick -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
