Hello- I've downloaded and compiled the source for Tesseract 3.02.02 and 
installed the English learning files. To test the installation I am using 
what I believe to be a pristine input image which was just a screenshot of 
some tesseract home page text- so there is no markings or anything like 
that which may occur from a scanned text image. I fed this image into 
tesseract but the output is mostly garbled and the conversion very poor. A 
couple of words were correctly translated but the rest is not close. I have 
a feeling that something may be off in my environment or something and 
someone might see the output and know immediately what my issue is.

I'm running on a 64 bit Linux RedHat 6 install.

Initially I built and installed tesseract 3.03 but had the same result. So 
I ran 'sudo make uninstall' and then compiled and installed 3.02 instead 
but there was very little difference in the output.

I confirmed that english language was installed with:

> tesseract --list-langs
List of available languages (1):
eng

I've attached the input image as well as the file containing the output 
text.

Is this output what I should expect, or is something definitely off here? 
Any assistance that folks could give would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "tesseract-ocr" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tesseract-ocr" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Tessevacl dues vanuus Image pmcesslng upevalluns Internally (using me Leplunlca 
library) befuve dulng me actual OCR. It generally dues a
very guud jub uflhls, bullheve wm inevitably be cases where :1 Isn‘I guud 
encugn, much can result m a significant reduction m accuracy.

<<attachment: Screenshot.png>>

Reply via email to