Hi Stef, They have indeed no effect as far as I have found. The idea is great, but unfortunately it just does not seem to work.
I have found no working demonstrations of it after looking for quite an amount of time. We have instead found a strong ambiguous character set combined with processing the output helps to get results within an expected pattern. On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 9:29:39 PM UTC+8, Stef wrote: > > I'm trying to use user wordlists with the bazaar config but it seems to > have no effect on the OCR result in my case. Therefore I printed the > current parameters to verify whether the user-words list is used. This > confirmed that the variables > load_system_dawg, load_freq_dawg, user_words_suffix and > user_patterns_suffix were set correctly (to 0, 0, user-words, and > user-patterns, respectively) but it doesn't show the user-provided > filenames: > user_words_file A filename of user-provided words. > user_patterns_file A filename of user-provided patterns. > Is this just a bug/omission in the --print-parameters output or did > tesseract fail to load these files (tessereact 3.05.00dev)? > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/e34be1d8-a6b8-4ade-b829-ac7f60aa4c9f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
