I am trying to recognize the recipient's name and address. This is the
output from rotated.jpg.
NICK WM
355 H 31' a 9795
BLAINE WA 98230—4124
HI!”IIIIIHNIIIHHIHH IIIIIHHIHH
Ul 3:01.119anan ol l/6047803396d1l?
:IIJHHII m I"!!!
IRACKING ID' YBABIMIMQBOG?
It's not perfect, but still allows me to look up the recipient from the
database. This is the output from normal.jpg (not rotated):
'7‘”"NU{WIWUMUflJIlUUUWWW"
H
II‘[(6151{mil/IUflI/IIMIII mug/MW 1:
mo M960
D~085
It is really bad. I am puzzled why the results differ so much from the same
input image and command, except with one rotated. Thank you
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 12:13:01 PM UTC-7, George Tsai wrote:
>
> I am wondering if anyone can give me guidance on this interesting issue. I
> have a shipping label. tesseract performs much better when it's rotated
> compared to unrotated. The commands I used is "tesseract input_image_name
> output_text_name -psm 0" for both image files. I have also dumped tessinput
> to see what tesseract is actually seeing, and they look the same, except
> one is rotated, and the other is not. Thank you for your help.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tesseract-ocr" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/166221bb-909f-4985-9dbf-974fb6e79d18%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
