Lets assume we have 600dpi pictures of typed text, without much noise, border or too much rotation. The results are good, but not great. So what else could we do?
I would like to... 1. ... know wich file format is best. jpg? png? tiff? I didn't find documentation for that. 2. ... give tesseract more time for better results. Is there am option to do that? (I didn't find one) 3. ... give tesseract more computation power for better results. (I didn't find an option) 4. ... see where tesseract is not sure about things, so I can correct them. It would be great if someone could provide me some documentation (or even opinion) about this questions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/43932059-b276-48d4-bc47-fef797da0d2f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
