No takers huh? :(

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 1:18:40 PM UTC-7, Luis Zertuche wrote:
>
> Hello Tesseract Gurus!
>
> I'm working on a  pdf2text extraction for legal documents. I've done some 
> searches and found tips to improve quality, but I was wondering if someone 
> here can provide info beyond the basics. Image processing-wise I've been: 
> resizing to 600dpi, correcting for skew angle and [denoising with a median 
> filter, contrast stretching, dilating with a small structuring element and 
> otsu_thresholding] All those things improved the results only for a subset 
> of the documents and given how widely they vary in acquisition quality, 
> noise level and contrast, Ive realized the imaging pipeline is not one size 
> fits all. I'm considering creating parallel image processing pipelines and 
> do OCR on all of them and just pick the best,
>
> *1. Can anyone comment on what would be some good variations of an imaging 
> pipelines for 'high variance dirty-text' ? Or alternatively can anyone 
> think of an imaging pipeline that would cover a wider range of document 
> quality?*
>
> As far as tesseract parameters go. I've put together a small parameter 
> exploration loop evaluating iterations with a text-quality metric(M2, based 
> on number of dictionary words, using pyenchant), here is an example for the 
> linesize value parameter for a single document:
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.25, M2 value is 0.661157024793
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.35, M2 value is 0.661157024793
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.45, M2 value is 0.644628099174
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.55, M2 value is 0.611111111111
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.65, M2 value is 0.0
>
> *+++For linesize value, 1.75, M2 value is 0.693693693694*
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.85, M2 value is 0.672413793103
>
> +++For linesize value, 1.95, M2 value is 0.631578947368
>
> +++For linesize value, 2.05, M2 value is 0.0
>
> Here the best linsize value is 1.75 for that document, which yields good 
> results(the ). From this info,
>
> *2. Can anyone recommend what are some good parameters to do apply this 
> method with? Any other tips of combining parameters into something more 
> general o any other exploration tips? *
>
> Thanks for reading! Any other potentially useful tips or info would be 
> greatly appreciated, whether its on the image processing or on the 
> tesseract parameters.
>
> Best, Luis. 
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tesseract-ocr" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/b4f2bc10-cd0a-4b23-af97-f46faeec58be%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to