LSTM recognize via TessBaseAPIRecognize() gives me the following performance numbers for the same bi-tonal image. The image is read and passed as a bitmap. These numbers are only for the TessBaseAPIRecognize() call portion of the process.
The question is this: should I have expected LSTM Only mode to be faster than Tesseract and Cube mode? This is an x64 Windows build of Tesseract with Leptonica 1.74.1. eng.traindata was used from the 4.0 download. RECOGNIZE TIME: 00:00:11.3292062 | ENGINE: LstmOnly RECOGNIZE TIME: 00:00:05.9569210 | ENGINE: TesseractAndCube RECOGNIZE TIME: 00:00:10.6854010 | ENGINE: TesseractAndLstm RECOGNIZE TIME: 00:00:10.6725257 | ENGINE: Default -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/bf2efcb0-85ee-4b75-9a23-7a6dfbd119c2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
