for engtrain and engeval they almost have the same command but for eval you
specify the font using the argument --font-list, while in train you define
the fonts in language-specifics.sh , I ran both command and I noticed that
they produce the same results files, except in engtrain case there will be
lstmf file for each font in language-specific.sh.
but now there is another question, in the fine tuning
training/lstmtraining --model_output ~/tesstutorial/impact_from_small/impact
--continue_from ~/tesstutorial/engoutput/base_checkpoint \
--train_listfile ~/tesstutorial/engeval/eng.training_files.txt \
and for evaluating its also uses:
training/lstmeval --model ~/tesstutorial/impact_from_small/impact_checkpoint
for me it seems its a typo at the fine tuning command since the argument
so in both cases the commands contains engeval, my question, since I don't
want to run the fine tuning many times, so can I use the training files
that exists in the engtrain ? instead to create files for the engeval for
every font and then run the fine tune against its training files.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.