Thanks! That is pretty clear.
On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 8:42:00 PM UTC+8, shree wrote: > > Please see https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tessdata/issues/72 > > > > On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 2:26:55 PM UTC+5:30, Yang Yu wrote: >> >> Good day! >> >> Recently I was using tesseract (4.0 alpha) to do Chinese OCR and it works >> really great. Now I want to pick up a best model to use but I find several >> versions. What is the difference between them? >> >> 1. chi_sim from >> https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/wiki/Data-Files (around 50M) >> 2. chi_sim from >> https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tessdata/tree/master/best (around 13M) >> 3. chi_sim_vert from >> https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tessdata/tree/master/best (around 13M) >> 4. HanS from https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tessdata/tree/master/best >> (around 16M) >> >> All of them can work but the results are slightly different. From my own >> evaluation #4 is the best, but I don't have any insight. >> >> Appreciate for any help. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/d7a82214-a725-465c-b61a-1f1551ecb65f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
