Ah, now I see it has something to do with the way you doctored the images, I get the same output as you did when I ran your pic through. So what's the secret?
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 11:24:23 AM UTC-5, Jack wrote: > > I have a weird niche project here, essentially I have about 4,000 images, > each with 2 numbers between 0 and 127. > I've tweaked the images in a million different ways and I can't get > tesseract to recognized individual numbers, with the exception of 2, all > other 1 digit numbers are not recognized. > > Also, for some reason if I use tesseract directly I get way worse results, > whereas if I convert to pdf first and use ocrmypdf, which apparently uses > tesseract, I get WAY better results, which I don't understand. > > The font is very straight-forward I think, so I'm not sure if training > would be helpful, but I'm open to the idea if needed. > > Here are the sample images I'm using for testing, before and after I > modified them: > Before: https://imgur.com/a/PhjWXXK > After: https://imgur.com/a/sCRE67S > Okay some of them failed to upload but that's the gist. > > Thanks, > Jack > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/bca34cd1-5092-4601-bd98-ee3e3d2aa5ab%40googlegroups.com.
