On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:28:55PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:18:11PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > does linux have strtoll? IIRC, we're just reading it into an 'int' anyway, > > so why the long long? > > You wrote that code. =) I didn't even know strtoll existed. I use > strtol.
Wow that was a weird typo then. A typo that works? ;) Looks like I did, but we have strtol() in some places and strtoll() in others. I don't think it really matters, since strtol() on linux is a long int anyway (which I have no idea how many words that is). If anything, maybe we should make them all strtol(). > > > - Remove forking stuff in flood.c as it doesn't make sense to fork() > > > here > > > anyway as this is only bootstrap code. > > > - Make reports output either the current thread id or the pid > > > > I assume this is only temporary until we have a better GUID? We really > > shouldn't be calling apr_os_thread_id() and then trying to print it as > > an int. How about just a counter for each new thread/process? > > Maybe. Commit it. I don't care. I do like the fact that when > debugging I can correlate that to the thread/process id. That's a > bonus. -- justin I'll put it in the STATUS file for now, I'm tired ;) -a
