On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:22:36AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > if you really don't like /usr/local (why? :), then we could use ... > > /usr/local/flood +1 > > /usr/local/flood is fine with me. It fits with how httpd and APR > are setup by default. -- justin
I don't understand why this is an issue. I use --prefix to define where things should be installed. Typically that defaults to /usr/local. Any reason we shouldn't do the same? (I'm ok with our directory being called flood or flood-1) -aaron
