AHHH... you are confusing apr/test (Ryan's ongoing efforts, even apart from the apr group) which tests internal functions, with perl-testsuite, which tests behavior of the server.
If Joe's tests work - commit them :-) And the tests you cite... ssl/http.t is expected to fail today, mod_ssl once provided HTTP/1.0 responses, irrespective of ass-backwards requests (those that are pre HTTP/1.0, where the request is simply GET /foo with no version tag), while it now provides an HTTP/0.9 response (no headers.) Both behaviors are wrong, and the thorough solution isn't quite trivial, but we expect to implement good behavior RSN (so we look at the request and then emit the correct HTTP/1.0 or 0.9 response.) The others concern me... -verbose feedback would be helpful. Is this apache 2.0.45-dev or 2.1.0-dev? Bill At 10:34 PM 2/6/2003, Stas Bekman wrote: >I haven't seen any activity with maintaining tests in a while and I have a >bunch of ssl tests failing. I remember Ryan working on a new test suite. >What's the current status of things? Should Joe's new php tests be committed? > >These fail for me: >ssl/basicauth.t 3 1 33.33% 2 >ssl/http.t 255 65280 2 2 100.00% 1-2 >ssl/proxy.t 169 5 2.96% 113-117 >ssl/varlookup.t 72 4 5.56% 38-39 52-53 >5 tests and 6 subtests skipped. > > >__________________________________________________________________ >Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker >http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com >http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
