On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:05, Stas Bekman wrote: > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > > >>And it's still off by one in your new patch... have you considered getting > >>a > >>decent editor? ;) > > > > > > I don't want to even start thinking about Emacs dude ;-) I prefer to put > > the blame on me, not my editor, sorry ;-) > > where did you see me mention emacs, dude? ;)
I just know ;-) > Both emacs and vi settings are given here: > http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/devel/core/coding_style.html#Coding_Style_Guide > > > Changed and comitted then ;-) > > cool, also please add an entry to Changes, as this is an important "bug" fix > for users to know about. Done! > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson /gozer\@(cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ 88C3A5A5 (122FF51B/C634E37B) http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3 A5A5 Q: It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious. perl -e'$$=\${gozer};{$_=unpack(P7,pack(L,$$));/^JAm_pH\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
