Geoffrey Young wrote:
probably not.  see Log::Log4perl and Log::Dispatch for existing
frameworks
so you don't have to reinvent the wheel :)


Not so much about reinventing the wheel, but about not creating unneeded
dependencies.


the whole dependency issue is more of a religious debate.  personally, I
tend to see "no dependencies" it as silly.  dependencies are what CPAN is
all about - I see no need to add (and more importantly, maintain) modules in
the core distribution that do practically the same thing as other actively
maintained CPAN modules just because you don't want to require installation
of additional 3rd party modules when using your own 3rd party ones.

I fail to see what this has to do with "religion". If my modules are independant they work out of box. Creating dependancies potentially creates obstacles for my users. .e.g. if the module my module depends on suddenly breaks.


Besides that, I have no problem with dependencies.

Or may be it belongs to Apache::Log. or if you don't want to pollute
Apache namespace, ModPerl::Log, which we should probably move warn and
other calls to anyway, since they aren't a part of Apache API. I like
the idea.


We already have all kinds of logging stuff in Apache::Log that's Apache API
specific, so definitely not there.

s/is/is not/?

but please reconsider adding modules to core that duplicate (or even come
close to duplicating) available CPAN modules.

I don't have any code, I was just pinging whether there is an interest. Thanks for the followup, Geoff.


__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

Reply via email to